Sydney Zick vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Zick's second serve performance over the last 6 months is more effective, winning 44.74% of points compared to Silva's 39.89%. This aspect is crucial for match predictions.
• When it comes to returning games, Zick has been more successful, capturing 51.5% of opponent second serve points versus Silva's 45.71%. For first serve returns, Silva edges slightly with 26.77% over Zick's 26.1%.
• Under pressure, Silva demonstrates slightly better breakpoint saving ability at 50.29%, compared to Zick's 48.28%, an essential statistic for live in-game betting.
• Performance wise, Zick has won 57.14% of matches over the past year, while Silva has won 53.95%, indicating Zick's slightly superior recent record.
• Considering surface preferences, Zick excels on Hard courts with a 61% win rate, while Silva performs best on Clay, winning 62% of the time. This implies that surface will play a crucial role in this match-up.
• In the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level, Silva has a higher win percentage at 69.23% compared to Zick's 57.14%, showing Silva’s strength at this tier.
• Analyzing the quality of opponents over the past year, Zick has faced more challenging competition, with their opponents averaging a rank of 167.14 versus Silva's 328.17.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Zick appears stronger, winning 50% of deciding sets, compared to Silva's 42% win rate.
• For break point conversion, Zick shows a significant advantage with 45.31%, while Silva converts 32.83%, indicative of Zick's better performance in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the upcoming match, several factors suggest that Zick may have the upper hand. Their stronger second serve performance and superior breakpoint conversion rate stand out as significant advantages.

Although Silva performs slightly better in saving breakpoints, Zick's prowess in returning games and tackling tougher opponents gives them an edge. Additionally, in the critical scenario of a deciding set, Zick has demonstrated greater resilience.

The playing surface could also be a determinant, as Zick tends to excel on Hard courts, which may align with the conditions of this upcoming match.

Given these insights, Zick appears to be the stronger candidate and is most likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.